Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: the mediating role of inclusive leadership
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. Train-the-trainers: implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malays. J. Learn. Instr. 8, 1–19 (2011).
Strachan, R., & Liyanage, L. (2015). Active student engagement: The heart of effective learning. Global innovation of teaching and learning in higher education: transgressing boundaries, 255–274.
Fink, L. D., Davis, J. R. & Arend, B. D. Facilitating seven ways of learning: a resource for more purposeful, effective, and enjoyable college teaching (Routledge, 2013).
Tinto, V. Enhancing student success: Taking the classroom success seriously. Int. J. First Year Higher Educ. 3(1), 1–8. (2012).
Google Scholar
Nadelson, L. S. & Seifert, A. L. Integrated STEM defined: contexts, challenges, and the future. J. Educ. Res. 110(3), 221–223 (2017).
Google Scholar
Nicolaides, A. Innovative teaching and learning methodologies for higher education Institutions. Educ. Res. 3(8), 620–626 (2012).
Weng, C., Chen, C. & Ai, X. A pedagogical study on promoting students’ deep learning through design-based learning. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 33(4), 1653–1674 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rohaetin, S. & Kartini, K. Motivation and learning achievement of economic education students, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Palangka Raya During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang 12(02), 222–233 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gess-Newsome, J. et al. Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 41(7), 944–963 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hattie, J. The black box of tertiary assessment: an impending revolution. Tertiary Assess. Higher Educ. Student Outcomes: Policy Pract. Res. 259, 275 (2009).
Cheung, A. C. & Slavin, R. E. The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 9, 88–113 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yakovleva, N. O. & Yakovlev, E. V. Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education. Pacific Sci. Rev. 16(2), 75–80 (2014).
Google Scholar
Debs, L., Miller, K. D., Ashby, I. & Exter, M. Students’ perspectives on different teaching methods: comparing innovative and traditional courses in a technology program. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 37(3), 297–323 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kamran, F., Kanwal, A., Afzal, A. & Rafiq, S. Impact of interactive teaching methods on students learning outcomes at university level. J. Positive School Psychol. 7(7), 89–105 (2023).
Betti, A., Biderbost, P. & García Domonte, A. Can active learning techniques simultaneously develop students’ hard and soft skills? Evidence from an international relations class. Plos One 17(4), e0265408 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lund Dean, K. & Wright, S. Embedding engaged learning in high enrollment lecture-based classes. Higher Educ. 74(4), 651–668 (2017).
Google Scholar
Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H. & Churi, P. P. Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: an empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. J. Appl. Res. Higher Educ. 13(3), 649–663 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. H. et al. An individualized intervention approach to improving university students’ learning performance and interactive behaviors in a blended learning environment. Interact. Learn. Environ. 28(2), 231–245 (2020).
Google Scholar
Teräs, H. Collaborative online professional development for teachers in higher education. Profession. Develop. Educ. 42(2), 258–275 (2016).
Google Scholar
Alam, F., Das, H. K. & Arafin, S. S. Incorporating student voice: bring changes in teaching techniques of college-level management education in Bangladesh. J. Appl. Res. Higher Educ. 15(3), 866–883 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16, 235–266 (2004).
Google Scholar
Abdi, A. The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 2(1), 37–41 (2014).
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., et al. Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 47–61 (2015).
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. Teaching for meaningful learning: a review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Book excerpt. George Lucas Educ. Found. (2008).
Boudadi, N. A. & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. Effect of Gamification on students’ motivation and learning achievement in Second Language Acquisition within higher education: a literature review 2011–2019. EuroCALL Rev. 28(1), 57–69 (2020).
Miettinen, R. The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 19(1), 54–72 (2000).
Google Scholar
Eyler, J., & Giles Jr, D. E. Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass, Inc., 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104 (1999).
Li, C. C., Aldosari, M. A. & Park, S. E. Understanding pedagogical approaches on student learning styles. Ann. Dent. Oral Health 4(1), 1039–1045 (2021).
Yu, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Wu, J. & Wang, C. Improvement in critical thinking dispositions of undergraduate nursing students through problem-based learning: a crossover-experimental study. J. Nurs. Educ. 52(10), 574–581 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE annual conference & exposition (pp. 23–1200) (2013).
Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(23), 8410–8415 (2014).
Google Scholar
Prince, M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93(3), 223–231 (2004).
Google Scholar
Michael, J. Where’s the evidence that active learning works?. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 30(4), 159–167. (2006).
Chi, M. T. & Wylie, R. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014).
Google Scholar
Killian, M. & Bastas, H. The effects of an active learning strategy on students’ attitudes and students’ performances in introductory sociology classes. J. Scholar. Teach. Learn. 15(3), 53–67 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ölmefors, O. & Scheffel, J. High school student perspectives on flipped classroom learning. Pedag. Culture Soc. 31(4), 707–724 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hao, Y. & Lee, K. S. Teaching in flipped classrooms: exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 57, 250–260 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gillies, R. M. Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. Int. J. Educ. Res. 76, 178–189 (2016).
Google Scholar
Roschelle, J. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning/Springer-Verlag.
Ertmer, P. A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 42(3), 255–284 (2010).
Google Scholar
Rayner, S. Educational diversity and learning leadership: a proposition, some principles and a model of inclusive leadership? Educ. Rev. 61(4), 433–447 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ryan, J. C. & Tipu, S. A. Leadership effects on innovation propensity: a two-factor full range leadership model. J. Bus. Res. 66(10), 2116–2129 (2013).
Google Scholar
Shore, L. M. et al. Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. J. Manage. 37(4), 1262–1289 (2011).
Leithwood, K., Seashore, K., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation. (2004).
De Jong, L., Meirink, J. & Admiraal, W. School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teach. Teach. Educ. 86, 102925 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kidd, W. & Murray, J. Educators’ perspectives of online teaching during the pandemic: implications for initial teacher education. J. Educ. Teach. 48(4), 393–406 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wheldall, K., & Merrett, F. (2017). Positive teaching: the behavioural approach. Routledge.
Bao, Y. A dual mediation model of the association between principal inclusive leadership and teacher innovative behavior. Sci. Reports 14(1), 12320 (2024).
Google Scholar
Androutsos, A. & Brinia, V. Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship. Educ. Sci. 9(2), 113 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pozo-Rico, T., Poveda, R., Gutiérrez-Fresneda, R., Castejón, J. L., & Gilar-Corbi, R. (2023). Revamping teacher training for challenging times: teachers’ well-being, resilience, emotional intelligence, and innovative methodologies as key teaching competencies. Psychology research and behavior management, 1–18.
Huberman, M. (1992). Understanding teacher development. Teacher development and instructional mastery, 122–142.
Özgenel, M., Mert, P. & Parlar, H. Improving teacher performance: leadership qualities of school principals as a tool. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19(39), 1127–1148 (2020).
Lee, J. S. The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. Int. J. Educ. Res. 53, 330–340 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fagan, H. A. S., Wells, B., Guenther, S. & Matkin, G. S. The path to inclusion: a literature review of attributes and impacts of inclusive leaders. J. Leader. Educ. 21(1), 88–113 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gallegos, P. V. (2013). The work of inclusive leadership. Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion, 177–202.
Jiang, J., Ding, W., Wang, R. & Li, S. Inclusive leadership and employees’ voice behavior: a moderated mediation model. Curre. Psychol. 41(9), 6395–6405 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kobylarek, A., Błaszczyński, K., Ślósarz, L. & Madej, M. Critical Thinking Questionnaire (CThQ)–construction and application of critical thinking test tool. Andrag. Adult Educ. Soc. Market. 2(2), 1–1 (2022).
Google Scholar
Prakash, S. Attitude of student teachers towards innovative teaching learning methods. Paper presented in State level seminar on Innovative teaching learning methods in school education at Peniel rural college of education on 14th March 2012 (2012).
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plann. 46(1–2), 1–12 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kivunja, C. Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. Int. J. Higher Educ. 3(4), 37–48 (2014).
Google Scholar
Meng, Q., Jia, J. & Zhang, Z. A framework of smart pedagogy based on the facilitating of high order thinking skills. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 17(3), 251–266 (2020).
Google Scholar
Okolie, U. C. et al. Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through engagement with innovative pedagogical practices in Global South. Higher Educ. Res. Develop. 41(4), 1184–1198 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lee, N. Y., Wang, Z. & Lim, B. The development of critical thinking: What university students have to say. Teach. Higher Educ. 29(1), 286–299 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J. & Ahmad, Z. Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Soc. Sci. Human. Open. 9, 100839 (2024).
Byers, T., Imms, W. & Hartnell-Young, E. Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes. Stud. Educ. Evaluat. 58, 167–177 (2018).
Google Scholar
Randel, A. E. et al. Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 28(2), 190–203 (2018).
Korkmaz, A. V., Van Engen, M. L., Knappert, L. & Schalk, R. About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: a systematic review of inclusive leadership research. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 32(4), 100894 (2022).
Kuknor, S. C. & Bhattacharya, S. Inclusive leadership: new age leadership to foster organizational inclusion. Eur. J. Traini. Develop. 46(9), 771–797 (2022).
Google Scholar
link
