Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students’ learning outcomes: a technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach
Li, Y., Sadiq, G., Qambar, G. & Zheng, P. The impact of students’ use of ChatGPT on their research skills: the mediating effects of autonomous motivation, engagement, and self-directed learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).
Samala, A. D. et al. Unveiling the landscape of generative artificial intelligence in education: a comprehensive taxonomy of applications, challenges, and future prospects. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).
Wang, S. & Zhang, H. Generative AI in international hotel marketing: impacts on employee creativity and performance. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 36, 57–76; (2025).
Google Scholar
Bewersdorff, A. et al. Taking the next step with generative artificial intelligence: the transformative role of multimodal large Language models in science education. Learn. Individ Differ. 118, 102601 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ali, O. et al. The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: challenges and strategies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 199, 123076 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gao, Z. et al. Enhancing academic performance of business students using GAI: an interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. Int. J. Manag Educ. 22, 100958 (2024).
Rasul, T. et al. Enhancing academic integrity among students in GenAI era: A holistic framework. Int. J. Manag Educ. 22, 101041 (2024).
Alshammari, S. H. & Babu, E. The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students’ behavioural intention to use ChatGPT. Sci. Rep. 15, 7169 (2025).
Google Scholar
Duffy, H. & Weil, S. E. February ChatGPT, cheating, and the future of education. Harv. Crimson 23 (2023).
Camilleri, M. A. Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use chatgpt: using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 201, 123247 (2024).
Google Scholar
Antonietti, C. et al. Development and validation of the ICAP technology scale to measure how teachers integrate technology into learning activities. Comput. Educ. 192, 104648 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lim, W. M. et al. GAI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A Paradoxical perspective from management educators. Int. J. Manag Educ. 21, 100790 (2023).
Liu, Y., Park, J. & McMinn, S. Using generative artificial intelligence/chatgpt for academic communication: students’ perspectives. Int. J. Appl. Linguist (2024).
Wang, S., Sun, Z., Li, M., Zhang, H. & Metwally, A. H. S. Leveraging TikTok for active learning in management education: an extended technology acceptance model approach. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 22, 101009; (2024).
Liang, J. et al. The relationship between student interaction with generative artificial intelligence and learning achievement: serial mediating roles of self-efficacy and cognitive engagement. Front. Psychol. 14, 1285392 (2023).
Google Scholar
Suriano, R. et al. Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learn. Instr. 95, 102011 (2025).
Google Scholar
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 1–10 (2001).
Google Scholar
Bhushan, P., Sengupta, A. & Abraham, C. Technology-mediated learning in the workplace: influence of personalization. Manag. Decis. (2025).
Soh, P. H. & Subramanian, A. M. Is usage a missing link in explaining the perceived learning outcome of technology-mediated learning? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 55, 50–66 (2008).
Google Scholar
Rosli, M. S. & Saleh, N. S. Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university students during Covid-19: integrating the full spectrum of self-determination theory and self-efficacy into the technology acceptance model. Curr. Psychol. 42, 18212–18231 (2023).
Google Scholar
Huang, K. L. et al. Integrating AIGC into product design ideation teaching: an empirical study on self-efficacy and learning outcomes. Learn. Instr. 92, 101929 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boubker, O. From chatting to self-educating: can AI tools boost student learning outcomes? Expert Syst. Appl. 238, 121820 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gao, L. et al. (eds) (Xuehui). Ask ChatGPT first! Transforming learning experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Stud. High. Educ. (2024).
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61, 101860 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Wang, Y. & Ortega-Martín, J. L. The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate. Porta Linguarum. 40, 253–273 (2023).
Lin, J. & Wang, Y. Unpacking the mediating role of classroom interaction between student satisfaction and perceived online learning among Chinese EFL tertiary learners in the new normal of post-COVID-19. Acta Psychol. 245, 104233 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. & Wang, L. Voice coding interactive music game teaching mode based on wireless network. Entertain Comput. 50, 100673 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jia, X. H. & Tu, J. C. Towards a new conceptual model of AI-enhanced learning for university students: the roles of artificial intelligence capabilities, general self-efficacy, learning motivation, and critical thinking awareness. Systems 12, 74 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Manag J. 45, 1137–1148 (2002).
Google Scholar
Junedi, B. et al. The relationship between creative self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement in online learning. AIP Conf. Proc. (2023).
McGuire, J., De Cremer, D. & Van de Cruys, T. Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence. Sci. Rep. 14, 18525 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, S., Sun, Z., Wang, H., Yang, D. & Zhang, H. Enhancing student acceptance of artificial intelligence-driven hybrid learning in business education: interaction between self-efficacy, playfulness, emotional engagement and university support. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 23, 101184; (2025).
Olga, A. et al. GAI: Implications and Applications for Education. Preprint at (2023).
Almulla, M. A. Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: university students perspective. Heliyon 10, e32220 (2024).
Google Scholar
Leong, J. et al. Putting things into context: GAI-enabled context personalization for vocabulary learning improves learning motivation. Proc. CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. 32, 1–15 (2024).
Nguyen-Viet, B. & Nguyen-Viet, B. The synergy of immersion and basic psychological needs satisfaction: exploring gamification’s impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. Acta Psychol. 252, 104660 (2025).
Google Scholar
Xu, B. Mediating role of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relationship between teacher support and academic achievement. Sci. Rep. 14, 24705 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yoon, S. H., Yang, S. B. & Lee, S. H. Comprehensive examination of the bright and dark sides of generative AI services: A mixed-methods approach. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 101491 (2025).
Holmes, W. & Miao, F. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research (UNESCO Publishing, 2023).
Ackermann, H. et al. How adaptive social robots influence cognitive, emotional, and self-regulated learning. Sci. Rep. 15, 6581 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Pan, Z. Modeling the effect of Chinese EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and resilience on their work engagement: A structural equation modeling analysis. Sage Open. 13, 1–15 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yao, H., Liu, W. & Chen, S. Teachers sustainable teaching innovation and graduate students creative thinking: the chain mediating role of playfulness climate and academic self-efficacy. Int. J. Manag Educ. 22, 100900 (2024).
Wang, X. C. et al. The effect of university students’ academic self-efficacy on academic burnout: the chain mediating role of intrinsic motivation and learning engagement. J. Psychoeduc Assess. 42, 798–812 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rad, H. F. et al. Predicting academic procrastination of students based on academic self-efficacy and emotional regulation difficulties. Sci. Rep. 15, 3003 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wei, Y. et al. Exploring the factors that influence university students’ academic self-efficacy in blended learning: a study from the personal, interpersonal, and environmental perspectives. Sage Open. 12, 21582440221104815 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Navigating the school transition: Within-and between-person associations between adolescents’ academic self-efficacy, school relatedness, and intrinsic academic motivation. J. Sch. Psychol. 106, 101326 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wu, Q. & Xu, A. Poe or gemini for fostering writing skills in Japanese upper-intermediate learners: Uncovering the consequences on positive emotions, boredom to write, academic self‐efficacy and writing development. Br. Educ. Res. J. (2025).
Wang, D. & Wang, J. The impact mechanism of AES on improving english writing achievement. Sci. Rep. 15, 3928 (2025).
Google Scholar
Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H. & Yang, S. J. Effects of artificial Intelligence-Enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Comput. Educ. 194, 104684 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hu, R. & Li, C. Exploring the roles of entrepreneurial education, proactive personality and creative Self-Efficacy in the formation of undergraduates’ new venture ideas in China. Behav. Sci. 15, 185 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, S., Sun, Z. & Chen, Y. Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students’ self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 4919–4939 (2023).
Google Scholar
Han, J. & Geng, X. University students’ approaches to online learning technologies: the roles of perceived support, affect/emotion and self-efficacy in technology-enhanced learning. Comput. Educ. 194, 104695 (2023).
Google Scholar
OECD. PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Framework. (2022).
Chang, H. F. & Li, T. A framework for collaborating a large Language model tool in brainstorming for triggering creative thoughts. Think. Skills Creat 101755 (2025).
Liu, C. C. et al. An analysis of children’ interaction with an AI chatbot and its impact on their interest in reading. Comput. Educ. 189, 104576 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y. L., Wang, W. T. & Hsieh, M. J. The effects of students’ self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived and actual learning effectiveness: A digital game-based learning system. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).
Bearman, M. et al. Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assess. Eval High. Educ. 49, 893–905 (2024).
Google Scholar
Avcı, Ü. & Durak, H. Y. Creative thinking skills and creative thinking dispositions in learning environments: antecedents and consequences. Think. Skills Creat. 47, 101225 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shi, Y. et al. The effects of creative thinking on students’ cognitive learning outcomes: A literature review. In 2023 Int. Symp. Educ. Technol. (2023).
Cheng, K. H. An epistemic curiosity-evoking model for immersive virtual reality narrative reading: user experience and the interaction among epistemic curiosity, transportation, and attitudinal learning. Comput. Educ. 201, 104814 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 71, 102642 (2023).
Gherghel, C., Yasuda, S. & Kita, Y. Interaction during online classes fosters engagement with learning and self-directed study both in the first and second years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput. Educ. 200, 104795 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mou, T. Y. The practice of visual storytelling in STEM: influence of creative thinking training on design students’ creative self-efficacy and motivation. Think. Skills Creat. 51, 101459 (2024).
Google Scholar
World Digital Technology Academy (WDTA). Generative AI talent development framework. (2024).
Li, X. Z., Chen, C. C. & Kang, X. Research on the cultivation of sustainable development ability of higher vocational students by creative thinking teaching method. Front. Psychol. 13, 979913 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006).
He, W. J. & Wong, W. C. Gender differences in creative self-efficacy: findings of mean and variability analyses. Think. Skills Creat. 42, 100955 (2021).
Google Scholar
Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S. & Mijatovic, I. Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of moodle: students’ perception. Interact. Learn. Environ. 23, 496–514 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31, 2–24 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ Model. 6, 1–55 (1999).
Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. & Ullman J. B. Using Multivariate Statistics (Pearson, 2013).
McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M. H. R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol. Methods. 7, 64 (2002).
Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (1989).
Harman, H. H. Modern Factor Analysis (Univ. Chicago, 1976).
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334 (1951).
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis 7th edn (Prentice Hall, 2010).
Kline, T. J. Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach To Design and Evaluation (Sage, 2005).
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 18, 382–388 (1981).
Google Scholar
Rebekić, A. et al. Pearson’s or spearman’s correlation coefficient—which one to use? Poljoprivreda 21, 47–54 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sun, W. & Shi, H. Fostering success in online english education: exploring the effects of ICT literacy, online learning self-efficacy, and motivation on deep learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).
Xie, Z., Wu, X. & Xie, Y. Can interaction with generative artificial intelligence enhance learning autonomy? A longitudinal study from comparative perspectives of virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition preferences. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. (2024).
Magenes, S. et al. Learning skills, creativity, and self-efficacy in vocational school students. Learn. Motiv. 79, 101829 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kent, J. et al. Client-based student consulting: insights for course design and delivery. Int. J. Manag Educ. 21, 100854 (2023).
Urban, M. et al. ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: an experimental study. Comput. Educ. 215, 105031 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wei, L., Zhang, W. & Lin, C. The study of the effectiveness of design-based engineering learning: the mediating role of cognitive engagement and the moderating role of modes of engagement. Front. Psychol. 14, 1151610 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kumar, S. et al. Will artificial intelligence drive the advancements in higher education? A tri-phased exploration. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 201, 123258 (2024).
Google Scholar
Miguel-Alonso, I. et al. Evaluation of the novelty effect in immersive virtual reality learning experiences. Virtual Real. 28, 27 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jiang, J. & Fryer, L. K. The effect of virtual reality learning on students’ motivation: A scoping review. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 40, 360–373 (2024).
Google Scholar
Long, T., Gero, K. I. & Chilton, L. B. Not just novelty: a longitudinal study on utility and customization of an AI workflow. In Proc. 2024 ACM Des. Interact. Syst. Conf. 782–803 (2024).
Consoli, T., Désiron, J. & Cattaneo, A. What is technology integration and how is it measured in K-12 education? A systematic review of survey instruments from 2010 to 2021. Comput. Educ. 197, 104742 (2023).
Google Scholar
Herft, A. A Teacher’s Prompt Guide To ChatGPT Aligned with ‘what Works Best’ (CESE NSW, 2023).
link
