Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students’ learning outcomes: a technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach

0
Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students’ learning outcomes: a technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach
  • Li, Y., Sadiq, G., Qambar, G. & Zheng, P. The impact of students’ use of ChatGPT on their research skills: the mediating effects of autonomous motivation, engagement, and self-directed learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).

  • Samala, A. D. et al. Unveiling the landscape of generative artificial intelligence in education: a comprehensive taxonomy of applications, challenges, and future prospects. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).

  • Wang, S. & Zhang, H. Generative AI in international hotel marketing: impacts on employee creativity and performance. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 36, 57–76; (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewersdorff, A. et al. Taking the next step with generative artificial intelligence: the transformative role of multimodal large Language models in science education. Learn. Individ Differ. 118, 102601 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, O. et al. The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: challenges and strategies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 199, 123076 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Z. et al. Enhancing academic performance of business students using GAI: an interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. Int. J. Manag Educ. 22, 100958 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasul, T. et al. Enhancing academic integrity among students in GenAI era: A holistic framework. Int. J. Manag Educ. 22, 101041 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshammari, S. H. & Babu, E. The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students’ behavioural intention to use ChatGPT. Sci. Rep. 15, 7169 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, H. & Weil, S. E. February ChatGPT, cheating, and the future of education. Harv. Crimson 23 (2023).

  • Camilleri, M. A. Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use chatgpt: using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 201, 123247 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonietti, C. et al. Development and validation of the ICAP technology scale to measure how teachers integrate technology into learning activities. Comput. Educ. 192, 104648 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, W. M. et al. GAI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A Paradoxical perspective from management educators. Int. J. Manag Educ. 21, 100790 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Park, J. & McMinn, S. Using generative artificial intelligence/chatgpt for academic communication: students’ perspectives. Int. J. Appl. Linguist (2024).

  • Wang, S., Sun, Z., Li, M., Zhang, H. & Metwally, A. H. S. Leveraging TikTok for active learning in management education: an extended technology acceptance model approach. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 22, 101009; (2024).

  • Liang, J. et al. The relationship between student interaction with generative artificial intelligence and learning achievement: serial mediating roles of self-efficacy and cognitive engagement. Front. Psychol. 14, 1285392 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Suriano, R. et al. Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learn. Instr. 95, 102011 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 1–10 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, P., Sengupta, A. & Abraham, C. Technology-mediated learning in the workplace: influence of personalization. Manag. Decis. (2025).

  • Soh, P. H. & Subramanian, A. M. Is usage a missing link in explaining the perceived learning outcome of technology-mediated learning? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 55, 50–66 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosli, M. S. & Saleh, N. S. Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university students during Covid-19: integrating the full spectrum of self-determination theory and self-efficacy into the technology acceptance model. Curr. Psychol. 42, 18212–18231 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K. L. et al. Integrating AIGC into product design ideation teaching: an empirical study on self-efficacy and learning outcomes. Learn. Instr. 92, 101929 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubker, O. From chatting to self-educating: can AI tools boost student learning outcomes? Expert Syst. Appl. 238, 121820 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, L. et al. (eds) (Xuehui). Ask ChatGPT first! Transforming learning experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Stud. High. Educ. (2024).

  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61, 101860 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., Wang, Y. & Ortega-Martín, J. L. The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate. Porta Linguarum. 40, 253–273 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. & Wang, Y. Unpacking the mediating role of classroom interaction between student satisfaction and perceived online learning among Chinese EFL tertiary learners in the new normal of post-COVID-19. Acta Psychol. 245, 104233 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. & Wang, L. Voice coding interactive music game teaching mode based on wireless network. Entertain Comput. 50, 100673 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, X. H. & Tu, J. C. Towards a new conceptual model of AI-enhanced learning for university students: the roles of artificial intelligence capabilities, general self-efficacy, learning motivation, and critical thinking awareness. Systems 12, 74 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Manag J. 45, 1137–1148 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Junedi, B. et al. The relationship between creative self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement in online learning. AIP Conf. Proc. (2023).

  • McGuire, J., De Cremer, D. & Van de Cruys, T. Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence. Sci. Rep. 14, 18525 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Sun, Z., Wang, H., Yang, D. & Zhang, H. Enhancing student acceptance of artificial intelligence-driven hybrid learning in business education: interaction between self-efficacy, playfulness, emotional engagement and university support. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 23, 101184; (2025).

  • Olga, A. et al. GAI: Implications and Applications for Education. Preprint at (2023).

  • Almulla, M. A. Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: university students perspective. Heliyon 10, e32220 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, J. et al. Putting things into context: GAI-enabled context personalization for vocabulary learning improves learning motivation. Proc. CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. 32, 1–15 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Viet, B. & Nguyen-Viet, B. The synergy of immersion and basic psychological needs satisfaction: exploring gamification’s impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. Acta Psychol. 252, 104660 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B. Mediating role of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relationship between teacher support and academic achievement. Sci. Rep. 14, 24705 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. H., Yang, S. B. & Lee, S. H. Comprehensive examination of the bright and dark sides of generative AI services: A mixed-methods approach. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 101491 (2025).

  • Holmes, W. & Miao, F. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research (UNESCO Publishing, 2023).

  • Ackermann, H. et al. How adaptive social robots influence cognitive, emotional, and self-regulated learning. Sci. Rep. 15, 6581 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. & Pan, Z. Modeling the effect of Chinese EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and resilience on their work engagement: A structural equation modeling analysis. Sage Open. 13, 1–15 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, H., Liu, W. & Chen, S. Teachers sustainable teaching innovation and graduate students creative thinking: the chain mediating role of playfulness climate and academic self-efficacy. Int. J. Manag Educ. 22, 100900 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. C. et al. The effect of university students’ academic self-efficacy on academic burnout: the chain mediating role of intrinsic motivation and learning engagement. J. Psychoeduc Assess. 42, 798–812 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rad, H. F. et al. Predicting academic procrastination of students based on academic self-efficacy and emotional regulation difficulties. Sci. Rep. 15, 3003 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. et al. Exploring the factors that influence university students’ academic self-efficacy in blended learning: a study from the personal, interpersonal, and environmental perspectives. Sage Open. 12, 21582440221104815 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. et al. Navigating the school transition: Within-and between-person associations between adolescents’ academic self-efficacy, school relatedness, and intrinsic academic motivation. J. Sch. Psychol. 106, 101326 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Q. & Xu, A. Poe or gemini for fostering writing skills in Japanese upper-intermediate learners: Uncovering the consequences on positive emotions, boredom to write, academic self‐efficacy and writing development. Br. Educ. Res. J. (2025).

  • Wang, D. & Wang, J. The impact mechanism of AES on improving english writing achievement. Sci. Rep. 15, 3928 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H. & Yang, S. J. Effects of artificial Intelligence-Enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Comput. Educ. 194, 104684 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, R. & Li, C. Exploring the roles of entrepreneurial education, proactive personality and creative Self-Efficacy in the formation of undergraduates’ new venture ideas in China. Behav. Sci. 15, 185 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Sun, Z. & Chen, Y. Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students’ self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 4919–4939 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. & Geng, X. University students’ approaches to online learning technologies: the roles of perceived support, affect/emotion and self-efficacy in technology-enhanced learning. Comput. Educ. 194, 104695 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Framework. (2022).

  • Chang, H. F. & Li, T. A framework for collaborating a large Language model tool in brainstorming for triggering creative thoughts. Think. Skills Creat 101755 (2025).

  • Liu, C. C. et al. An analysis of children’ interaction with an AI chatbot and its impact on their interest in reading. Comput. Educ. 189, 104576 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. L., Wang, W. T. & Hsieh, M. J. The effects of students’ self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived and actual learning effectiveness: A digital game-based learning system. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).

  • Bearman, M. et al. Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assess. Eval High. Educ. 49, 893–905 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Avcı, Ü. & Durak, H. Y. Creative thinking skills and creative thinking dispositions in learning environments: antecedents and consequences. Think. Skills Creat. 47, 101225 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y. et al. The effects of creative thinking on students’ cognitive learning outcomes: A literature review. In 2023 Int. Symp. Educ. Technol. (2023).

  • Cheng, K. H. An epistemic curiosity-evoking model for immersive virtual reality narrative reading: user experience and the interaction among epistemic curiosity, transportation, and attitudinal learning. Comput. Educ. 201, 104814 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 71, 102642 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherghel, C., Yasuda, S. & Kita, Y. Interaction during online classes fosters engagement with learning and self-directed study both in the first and second years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput. Educ. 200, 104795 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou, T. Y. The practice of visual storytelling in STEM: influence of creative thinking training on design students’ creative self-efficacy and motivation. Think. Skills Creat. 51, 101459 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Digital Technology Academy (WDTA). Generative AI talent development framework. (2024).

  • Li, X. Z., Chen, C. C. & Kang, X. Research on the cultivation of sustainable development ability of higher vocational students by creative thinking teaching method. Front. Psychol. 13, 979913 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006).

  • He, W. J. & Wong, W. C. Gender differences in creative self-efficacy: findings of mean and variability analyses. Think. Skills Creat. 42, 100955 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S. & Mijatovic, I. Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of moodle: students’ perception. Interact. Learn. Environ. 23, 496–514 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31, 2–24 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ Model. 6, 1–55 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. & Ullman J. B. Using Multivariate Statistics (Pearson, 2013).

  • McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M. H. R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol. Methods. 7, 64 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (1989).

  • Harman, H. H. Modern Factor Analysis (Univ. Chicago, 1976).

  • Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334 (1951).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis 7th edn (Prentice Hall, 2010).

  • Kline, T. J. Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach To Design and Evaluation (Sage, 2005).

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 18, 382–388 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebekić, A. et al. Pearson’s or spearman’s correlation coefficient—which one to use? Poljoprivreda 21, 47–54 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W. & Shi, H. Fostering success in online english education: exploring the effects of ICT literacy, online learning self-efficacy, and motivation on deep learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2024).

  • Xie, Z., Wu, X. & Xie, Y. Can interaction with generative artificial intelligence enhance learning autonomy? A longitudinal study from comparative perspectives of virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition preferences. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. (2024).

  • Magenes, S. et al. Learning skills, creativity, and self-efficacy in vocational school students. Learn. Motiv. 79, 101829 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J. et al. Client-based student consulting: insights for course design and delivery. Int. J. Manag Educ. 21, 100854 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. et al. ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: an experimental study. Comput. Educ. 215, 105031 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L., Zhang, W. & Lin, C. The study of the effectiveness of design-based engineering learning: the mediating role of cognitive engagement and the moderating role of modes of engagement. Front. Psychol. 14, 1151610 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. et al. Will artificial intelligence drive the advancements in higher education? A tri-phased exploration. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 201, 123258 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miguel-Alonso, I. et al. Evaluation of the novelty effect in immersive virtual reality learning experiences. Virtual Real. 28, 27 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. & Fryer, L. K. The effect of virtual reality learning on students’ motivation: A scoping review. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 40, 360–373 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, T., Gero, K. I. & Chilton, L. B. Not just novelty: a longitudinal study on utility and customization of an AI workflow. In Proc. 2024 ACM Des. Interact. Syst. Conf. 782–803 (2024).

  • Consoli, T., Désiron, J. & Cattaneo, A. What is technology integration and how is it measured in K-12 education? A systematic review of survey instruments from 2010 to 2021. Comput. Educ. 197, 104742 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herft, A. A Teacher’s Prompt Guide To ChatGPT Aligned with ‘what Works Best’ (CESE NSW, 2023).

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *